Somewhere right now, someone is hitting "share" on something that isn't true. They're not doing it to deceive anyone. They just believed it, felt something about it, and passed it along the way you'd pass along a good recipe or a funny video.

There is something about online search that should bother you more than it probably does:

Most people use the word "credibility" without ever stopping to define it. We say a source "seems credible." We dismiss claims as "not credible." We talk about credibility like we all know exactly what it means. But do we?

Looking back, it’s hard to believe that my whole journey started with a moon mission.

Before I built AmICredible, and before 15 years in healthcare technology and product strategy, I was trained as a physicist.

In a world where anyone can publish anything in seconds, how do you know what, or who, to trust?

There’s a moment I keep coming back to when people raise concerns about AmICredible. It usually starts with a fair question: Isn’t this just another layer between readers and newsrooms? Another intermediary. Another abstraction. Another step away from the reporting itself. The instinctive response ...

To those leading the next generation of technology — founders, executives, engineers, investors, and visionaries — we are at a turning point. Artificial intelligence now has the power to inform billions of people faster than any platform in history. That power carries a responsibility we can’t ...

When information spreads globally in a matter of seconds, we need to change our approach to building and measuring brand reputation. We need a metric that captures a brand’s ability to earn and sustain trust in an online environment filled with noise, skepticism, and misinformation. We need to be ...

byDan Nottingham, creator ofAmICredible